Learning and Teaching at the College
2021 HSC RESULTS
The College is very proud of the 2021 HSC results and the achievements of the students in this cohort.
- 74 Band 6s or E4 (mark between 90-100)
- 220 Band 5s (mark between 80-89)
- One ‘All Rounder’ - Band 6 in every course - Ritika Dosanjh
- 37 students received one or more Band 6
- 75% of students were in the top three bands (Band 4-6) within their subjects
- 16 students achieved an ATAR 90+
The College will acknowledge the 16 students that have achieved an ATAR over 90 at the High Achievers Academic Assembly on 17 February.
The College congratulates the following 2021 HSC students for achieving a Band 6 Result in one of more of their courses:
Maureen Abdelnour |
Studies of Religion II |
Laura Alivio |
Mathematics Standard 2 |
Maria Louise Baccay |
English Advanced, Mathematics Standard 2 |
Kristy Buckley |
Visual Arts |
Nikita Bulgak |
Community and Family Studies, Mathematics Advanced |
Paris Davies |
Community and Family Studies, Society and Culture, Studies of Religion I |
Owen Dixon |
Mathematics Standard 1 Examination |
Ritika Dosanjh |
Business Studies, English Standard, Legal Studies, Mathematics Standard 2, Personal Development, Health and Physical Education, Studies of Religion I |
Joshua Drumond |
Community and Family Studies, English Standard, Society and Culture, Studies of Religion I, Hospitality Examination (Food and Beverage) |
Rebecca Esaid |
Food Technology |
Weesayo Fajardo |
English Advanced, Mathematics Extension 1, Mathematics Advanced, Studies of Religion I |
Samuel Fakhouri |
Visual Arts |
Sunshine Ferreiro-Deluca |
Studies of Religion II |
Kayla Garcia |
Visual Arts |
Stephanie Hibbert |
Studies of Religion I |
Zoya Huang |
Visual Arts |
Phillip Krikellis |
Mathematics Standard 2 |
Anna Lima Bartosek |
English Advanced, Mathematics Standard 2, Society and Culture |
Abby Luyten |
Mathematics Standard 2, Studies of Religion II, Visual Arts |
Charmaine Marquinez |
English Advanced, Mathematics Extension 1, Mathematics Advanced, Personal Development, Health and Physical Education, Studies of Religion I |
Tamia Martinez |
Visual Arts |
Jamie Pandopoulos |
Business Studies, Economics (studied at SDEHS), Legal Studies, Mathematics Advanced, Studies of Religion I |
Kate Puckeridge |
Community and Family Studies, Studies of Religion II |
Brayden Quinn |
Mathematics Standard 2 |
Nathan Quizon |
Mathematics Standard 2 |
Brandon Rayan |
Mathematics Advanced |
Elisha Sailago |
Mathematics Advanced, Spanish Beginners |
Dilnaz Saini |
Community and Family Studies, English Standard, Studies of Religion II |
Maria Samaha |
Business Studies, English Standard, Studies of Religion II |
Shanaya Sarkari |
Food Technology |
Sonali Singh |
Studies of Religion II |
Noah Stuart |
English Advanced |
Alisa Thephavong |
English Advanced, Studies of Religion I |
Alexis Tyrrell |
Society and Culture |
Zoe Wahhab |
Studies of Religion II |
Jasmin Williams |
Community and Family Studies, Mathematics Standard 2 |
Amabelle Woolley |
Business Studies, Mathematics Standard 2, Studies of Religion I |
CLASS GROUPINGS 2022 - Year 7 - 10
FLEXIBLE ABILITY GROUPING
In 2022 we have continued to implement an organisational process where we CLUSTER groups of students in ability groups. This is a broader concept than streaming because students are placed into groups by considering a number of measures of their academic performance and progress. The groups are flexible because we constantly monitor student progress and will move the learning environment appropriately. Realistically in our educational setting, this will occur at two points in a year.
We create homogenous groups of students grouped together based on identified learning needs. In these groups like-learners have the opportunity to learn together in an appropriate learning environment. Students are placed into an environment that will best support their learning needs so that they can achieve their full potential.
This grouping practice also allows teachers to explicitly focus on addressing learning needs.
A focus on PEDAGOGICAL DESIGN will allow teachers to adjust the learning environment, teaching instruction and content organisation. Each of these explicit approaches should enable students to achieve in the full range of achievement in the Common Grade Scale.
TEACHERS ORGANISATION OF LEARNING - Differentiation
In any one year all students follow the same program of work, studying essential content and working towards the achievement of syllabus outcomes.
Teachers of classes will vary (differentiate) the learning activities to support students in learning content, and these activities will support the different learning needs of the Core, Structured and Extended learning groups. This will mean that periodically classes will engage in different activities in order to learn the same content.
PROCESS of GROUPING STUDENTS
- After enrolment and placement testing the Leaders of Learning - Curriculum and KLA Coordinators review diagnostic test data for individual students. This data provides information about the ways students learn and a snapshot of their learning achievement to date.
- Students are placed into a learning environment that will best support the identified student learning needs so that they achieve their potential. This is reviewed at two (2) points during the year.
- They will be clustered into three learning groups:
STUDENTS REQUIRING EXTENSION OR CHALLENGE in their LEARNING |
CORE LEARNING |
STUDENTS REQUIRING STRUCTURE in their LEARNING |
Students working at or beyond the stage who suit a faster pace or complexity in learning. Included in this group would be the majority of students identified as gifted and/or highly capable learners. Explicit teaching is focused on pre-assessment and subsequent curriculum compacting to allow extension and enrichment activities to occur, engaging with higher order thinking processes. |
Students working successfully within the stage who require a steady pace of learning and some explicit metacognitive planning for complexity in learning. This group has a stronger focus on the explicit teaching of language and communication skills. |
Students working within or below the stage who require a slower paced and more explicit teaching model. The aim would be a structured approach to move towards complexity with more modeling and scaffolding. This group would include the majority of students identified as having learning deficits. (Support from Diverse Learning Team) |
2022 CLASS GROUPING INFORMATION
Typically, the following conventions exist:
Year 7 |
Year 8 |
Year 9 |
Year 10 |
|
Extended |
E |
E |
E |
E |
Core |
D, J, O, R, S, T |
D, J, O, R, S, T |
D, J, O, R, S, T |
D, J, O, R, S, T |
Structured |
P |
P |
P |
P |
However, there are some exceptions:
YEAR 10: CAT (Catholic Studies) - informed by grouping with Electives, classes not identified by Extension, Core, Structured conventions (Coded as D, E, J, O, P, R, S, T)
YEAR 9: CAT (Catholic Studies) - informed by grouping with Electives, classes not identified by Extension, Core, Structured conventions (Coded as D, E, J, O, P, R, S, T)
YEAR 8 : HSIE/TEC/VAR - Practical class size, max 24 students, classes not identified by Extension, Core, Structured conventions (Coded as D, E, J, O, Q, P, R, S, T)
YEAR 7 : CAT/TEC/PDH - Practical class size, max 24 students, classes not identified by Extension, Core, Structured conventions (Coded as D, E, J, O, Q, P, R, S, T)
MATHEMATICS: Due to the Pathway structure of Stage 5 Mathematics, the following groupings exist for Year 9 and 10:
Mathematics |
Year 9 |
Year 10 |
Extended (5.3 Pathway) |
D,E,J |
D,E |
Core (5.2 Pathway) |
O,R,S,T |
J, O, R, S, T |
Structured (5.1 Pathway) |
P |
P |
In Year 8, due to the half block nature of the timetable, the following groupings are implemented:
Mathematics |
Year 8 |
Extended |
E, R |
Core |
D,J,S,T |
Structured |
O,P |
For Year 7 Mathematics, some preliminary data has been used to organise classes, however, all classes are considered Core, until they are reviewed during Semester 1.
Ms Chardy Miller
Leader of Learning - Curriculum Pedagogy